After Muslim rebels seized several towns and barangays in three provinces in the south, the next move was supposed to occupy Iligan City. Why Iligan? There are two schools of thought:
1) To embarrass the President and 2) teach the Iliganons a lesson for defiance.
Historical notes say, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo grew up in Iligan City. For the city to be overrun by any rebel force is already a nightmare; but how about a city so close to the heart of the Commander in Chief being seized by forces currently talking peace with the president? Boy, only hardened rebels wouldn’t know the repercussion to such an aggression.
Iliganons, on the other hand, have given a big NO NO to the MOA-AD. The strong objection parrarells that of North Cotabato and Zamboanga City. And all three provinces suffered the same wrath of the raging bulls.
So far, we have to credit the President for not getting too personal about her birthplace being threatened by rebels. She has not said a word about it. But governors of the three provinces and the Mayor of Iligan City have openly opposed the signing of the MOA_AD, leading to arming themselves up in defense..
The personal feeling of the Commander in Chief on the threat against Iligan may be irrelevant but thinking animals should have considered that before plunging into viol,ent belligenrency. The same thing should have been done before even offering the MOA-AD for approval. Peace talkers should have consulted and secured the blessings of the local residents and officials before dismembering their territories?
To a large extent, this lapse in judgment caused the MOA-ADs untimely demise. And ressurec ting the dead can only be an act of God.